Graphic Design
Marketing materials, digital graphics and branded assets for both print and online use.
Website Hosting & Maintenance
Reliable hosting and ongoing website support to keep your site secure, updated and running smoothly — so you can focus on your business.
Web Design
Custom WordPress websites built to showcase your business, improve your online presence and make it easy for customers to find and contact you.
Branding & Visual Identity
Logos, brand identity systems and brand guidelines designed to give your business a professional and recognisable look.
Behind the Scenes at BBC Cardiff
Today I had the opportunity to visit BBC Cardiff’s Central Square, and it was one of those experiences that reminds you just how much goes on behind the scenes before anything ever reaches our screens or radios.
From live newsrooms to radio studios — and even a brush with Doctor Who history — it was a day packed with insight, inspiration and a healthy dose of awe.
Inside the BBC Newsroom
One of the highlights was stepping into the BBC newsroom and seeing it in action. There’s an energy in that space that’s hard to describe — focused, fast-paced and quietly intense. Every screen, conversation and movement had purpose.
We learned how the newsroom operates in real time, how stories are tracked, updated and prioritised, and how teams work together under constant time pressure to keep the public informed.
It was a powerful reminder that news doesn’t just happen — it’s carefully constructed, checked and delivered by people working in perfect sync.
Learning the Autocue (and Giving It a Go)
One of the most exciting moments was learning how the autocue works — and even getting the chance to try it myself.
It’s far more technical than it looks from the outside. Timing, pacing, tone and confidence all matter, especially when you’re delivering information live. Reading from the autocue while staying natural and composed is a skill in itself, and giving it a go really highlighted just how much training and practice presenters put in.
It gave me a whole new appreciation for anyone delivering live news.
Behind the Radio Studios
We also toured the radio rooms, where we got an insight into how the different BBC radio channels operate from the same building.
Each studio had its own setup, sound, and rhythm — yet all were equally precise. Seeing presenters at work, surrounded by producers, engineers and live systems, really showed how radio is just as technically demanding as television, even if it’s less visually visible.
It’s a world where timing is everything and silence is just as important as sound.
Doctor Who Magic
As if the broadcast side of things wasn’t exciting enough, there was a moment that felt straight out of childhood — seeing Doctor Who costumes and props up close.
We saw:
- A Dalek from David Tennant’s era
- Matt Smith’s TARDIS
- Various costumes and production props
It was surreal seeing these iconic pieces in real life — reminders that BBC Cardiff isn’t just about news, but about storytelling on a global scale.
Hearing the Voices Behind the Voices
One of the most fascinating insights came from seeing — and hearing — how presenters are guided live on air.
We got a behind-the-scenes look at the production team communicating through earpieces worn by presenters. Hearing instructions, timing cues and updates being fed in real time while a broadcast is happening was eye-opening.
It showed just how much trust and coordination is required — presenters aren’t working alone, they’re supported every second by an entire production team.
A New Level of Appreciation
Walking through BBC Cardiff Central Square gave me a whole new respect for broadcast media. From the calm professionalism of the newsroom to the quiet technical mastery of radio and television, it’s clear that every moment on air is the result of teamwork, preparation and precision.
And of course, seeing a Dalek and the TARDIS along the way didn’t hurt either.
Final Thoughts
Today wasn’t just a tour — it was a reminder of how powerful storytelling, communication and collaboration can be. Whether it’s breaking news, live radio, or a sci-fi universe that’s captivated generations, the work happening inside BBC Cardiff reaches far beyond those walls.
An inspiring day, one I’ll be thinking about for a long time.
Three Days That Made a Lasting Impact: Boundless × Jason Mohammad’s Academy
Over the past three days, I’ve had the absolute privilege of being part of The Boundless Team × Jason Mohammad’s Academy, delivered in partnership with Employability Bridgend and Complete It — and it’s an experience that’s genuinely left a lasting impression on me.
What made this programme so special wasn’t just the skills we learned, but the encouragement, honesty and belief that ran through every session. It felt purposeful, supportive, and rooted in opening real pathways into creative careers here in Wales.
Day 1: Confidence, Inspiration & Teamwork
Day one centred around confidence, inspiration and teamwork — three things that sound simple on paper, but are fundamental in any creative industry.
A real highlight was hearing from special guest Danny Hargreaves, whose SFX work spans Doctor Who, Star Wars, War Between Land and Sea and more. Listening to Danny talk candidly about his journey, his creative process, and the realities of working at such a high level was hugely inspiring.
There was something grounding about hearing success stories that didn’t feel polished or untouchable — just honest, human, and motivating.
Day 2: Podcasting, Collaboration & Time Management
Day two shifted gears into podcasting and time management, where we worked as a team to co-write and produce a full podcast episode — from concept to delivery.
It was a brilliant lesson in collaboration under pressure. Ideas had to move quickly, communication had to be clear, and everyone had to play their part. Seeing how different strengths came together to create something cohesive was a reminder of how powerful teamwork can be in creative environments.
It wasn’t just about making a podcast — it was about learning how to problem-solve creatively, manage time effectively, and trust the process.
Day 3: Television, Studio Readiness & Autocue
Day three brought us into the world of television.
We covered:
- Time management in broadcast environments
- Being studio-ready
- Learning how to use an autocue
- Writing bulletins
Seeing how everything works behind the scenes was incredibly valuable. It demystified the process and showed just how much preparation, structure and teamwork goes into what viewers see on screen.
It was a real insight into the pace and precision required in broadcast media — and how confidence and preparation go hand in hand.
Learning from Jason Mohammad
I’m truly honoured to have had the opportunity to work alongside Jason Mohammad.
It’s rare — and genuinely refreshing — to see someone so highly respected in the industry give back in such a meaningful way. Jason’s commitment to helping people build confidence, skills and realistic pathways into creative careers in Wales is something special.
He’s been an outstanding coach and role model throughout the programme — encouraging, honest and deeply invested in everyone involved. I genuinely believe more people should look up to leaders like him.
More Than “Just” Three Days
While it’s technically only been three days, they’re three days that have absolutely made an impact on me and my career.
The advice, insights and encouragement from Jason and the entire team are things I’ll carry with me for a lifetime. It’s reminded me why creative spaces matter — and how powerful it is when opportunity, mentorship and belief come together.
Thank You
A huge thank you to The Boundless Team, Jason Mohammad, Employability Bridgend, Complete It, and everyone involved in making this experience possible.
What an experience — and one I’ll never forget.
The End of an Era: MTV Goes Dark After 44 Years
After 44 years on air, MTV’s traditional broadcast channels have officially shut down, marking the end of one of the most influential cultural forces in modern media. For a generation (or three), MTV wasn’t just a TV channel — it was the place where music, fashion, youth culture and rebellion collided.
Its closure isn’t just about a channel switching off. It’s a symbol of how completely the media landscape has changed in the age of streaming.
When MTV Was the Culture
When MTV launched in 1981 with Video Killed the Radio Star, it fundamentally changed how we experienced music. Artists weren’t just heard — they were seen. Image became as important as sound.
MTV created:
- Music video culture
- Global pop icons
- Youth-driven trends in fashion, language and attitude
Shows like Total Request Live, MTV Cribs, Jackass, Pimp My Ride and The Osbournes defined entire eras. Even when the channel drifted away from pure music, it still dictated what felt current, controversial and cool.
MTV didn’t just reflect youth culture — it shaped it.
The Slow Shift Away from Music
Ironically, MTV’s decline began when it stopped being about music.
As the 2000s rolled in, reality TV replaced music videos. Cheaper to produce and easier to binge, these formats dominated airtime while music content quietly faded into late-night slots.
At the same time, the internet was rising.
YouTube launched in 2005 and made music videos instantly accessible, on-demand, and global. Audiences no longer needed a TV schedule to discover new artists — they could search, share and replay endlessly.
MTV lost its monopoly overnight.
Streaming Changed Everything
The shutdown of MTV’s broadcast channels is really a consequence of streaming culture Today:
- Music lives on Spotify, Apple Music and SoundCloud
- Videos live on YouTube, TikTok and Instagram
- Artists break through on social platforms, not TV
Discovery is algorithm-led, not presenter-led.
Trends are created by communities, not programming schedules.
The idea of waiting for your favourite video to appear on TV now feels completely foreign.
From Gatekeeper to Brand
MTV’s power once came from its role as a gatekeeper — deciding which artists got visibility. In the streaming era, that power dissolved.
Anyone can upload. Anyone can go viral. Anyone can build an audience without approval.
MTV adapted by becoming more of a brand than a broadcaster — expanding into awards shows, online content, and licensing. But the traditional channel model couldn’t survive in a world where viewers expect instant access, personalisation and choice.
Why This Feels So Emotional
For many people, MTV represents a shared experience that streaming can’t replicate.
Everyone watched the same things at the same time.
You talked about last night’s show at school the next day.
Music videos felt like events.
Streaming is efficient, but it’s also isolating. We all live in our own curated feeds now, rarely sharing the same cultural moments.
MTV’s shutdown marks the loss of that collective rhythm.
What Comes Next
MTV as a concept isn’t gone — it’s just scattered.
Its spirit lives on in:
- TikTok trends
- YouTube creators
- Livestreams
- Viral music moments
But the era of linear broadcasting — of sitting in front of a TV and letting culture come to you — is officially over.
The future belongs to platforms that move faster, adapt quicker, and speak directly to niche audiences rather than one massive one.
Final Thoughts
The end of MTV’s broadcast channels isn’t just about nostalgia — it’s a reminder of how fast culture evolves.
MTV changed the world.
Streaming changed MTV.
And while the channel may have gone dark, its influence is everywhere — in how we consume music, how artists present themselves, and how youth culture continues to reinvent itself online.
After 44 years, MTV didn’t just sign off — it passed the mic.
The Death of GeoCities — and the Website Preserving the Internet’s Lost Soul
The Death of GeoCities — and the Website Preserving the Internet’s Lost Soul
Before social media feeds, algorithms, and perfectly aligned templates, the internet was messy. Loud. Personal.
And for millions of people, it lived on GeoCities.
Launched in the mid-1990s, GeoCities gave everyday users the power to build their own corner of the web — no rules, no brand guidelines, no aesthetic filters. Just blinking text, tiled backgrounds, pixel art, MIDI music, visitor counters and unfiltered personality.
When GeoCities shut down in 2009, a huge part of internet history vanished with it.
Or so we thought.
What GeoCities Really Was
GeoCities wasn’t just a website builder — it was an early social internet.
Users created pages about their hobbies, fan theories, pets, diaries, poetry, conspiracies, and obsessions. Sites were organised into “neighbourhoods” like Hollywood, SiliconValley, or Area51, giving people a sense of belonging long before platforms formalised it.
It was chaotic, amateur, and deeply human.
No engagement metrics.
No optimisation.
No influencers.
Just people making things because they wanted to.
When the Internet Decided to Grow Up
As the web evolved, design became cleaner, faster, more corporate.
Templates replaced experimentation. Platforms replaced personal sites. Personality gave way to polish.
When Yahoo! shut GeoCities down, it wasn’t just a technical decision — it marked a cultural shift. The internet moved from self-expression to self-presentation.
The weird bits didn’t fit anymore.
Enter Cameron’s World
That’s where Cameron’s World comes in.
Created by artist and developer Cameron Askin, Cameron’s World is a lovingly chaotic archive of GeoCities-era web design — rebuilt from thousands of salvaged pages. It doesn’t just document old websites; it recreates the experience of using the internet back then.
Scrolling through it feels like stepping into a time capsule:
- Animated GIFs everywhere
- Comic Sans, Times New Roman, WordArt chaos
- Broken layouts
- MIDI music autoplaying without consent
- Passion projects with zero self-awareness
It’s overwhelming. And that’s the point.
Why This Preservation Matters
Cameron’s World isn’t just nostalgia bait — it’s digital preservation.
Early internet culture is often dismissed as “cringe” or “ugly”, but it represents a time when creativity wasn’t monetised, curated or optimised. It shows what happens when people are given tools without being told how to use them “properly”.
In a world where most online spaces now look the same, GeoCities reminds us that the internet used to be:
- Personal instead of performative
- Expressive instead of branded
- Weird instead of safe
Preserving that matters — not just for memory, but for inspiration.
The Comfort of Digital Mess
There’s something strangely comforting about GeoCities-style chaos.
It feels honest. Imperfect. Unfiltered.
In contrast to today’s algorithm-led feeds, these sites weren’t designed to be liked, shared, or sold. They were designed to exist.
Cameron’s World lets us remember a time when the internet wasn’t trying to impress anyone — it was just trying to connect.
What We’ve Lost — and What We Can Learn
The death of GeoCities symbolises more than a platform shutting down. It represents the loss of ownership.
Today, our content lives on platforms we don’t control, subject to moderation changes, monetisation rules, and sudden shutdowns.
GeoCities gave people a home.
Cameron’s World gives us a reminder of what that felt like.
Maybe the future of the internet doesn’t need to look like the past — but it could learn from it. A little more mess. A little more freedom. A little less polish.
Final Thoughts
Cameron’s World isn’t just a tribute — it’s a quiet protest against how sanitised the internet has become. It celebrates creativity without permission, design without rules, and identity without optimisation.
GeoCities may be dead, but its spirit isn’t.
It’s blinking.
It’s loud.
And it’s still beautifully, unapologetically human.
Ofcom Launches Investigation into X Over Grok’s Sexualised Imagery
The UK’s media regulator Ofcom has launched an investigation into X (formerly Twitter) after serious concerns emerged around, the platform’s AI chatbot, and its ability to generate sexualised imagery in public spaces.
The move marks a pivotal moment for online regulation in the UK, testing how the Online Safety Act applies not just to user posts, but to AI-generated content produced by platforms themselves
At the centre of the investigation is a simple but uncomfortable question:
If an AI creates harmful content in response to user prompts, who is responsible?
What Is Grok — and Why Is It a Problem?
Grok is X’s generative AI assistant, designed to respond conversationally and generate images when prompted. Unlike standalone AI tools, Grok is embedded directly into a fast-moving social platform, where content is instantly visible, shareable, and difficult to contain once it spreads.
Concerns escalated when users began publicly tagging Grok and requesting explicit or sexualised modifications to images — requests that, in some cases, the system appeared to respond to.
This wasn’t happening behind closed doors. It was happening in full public view
The Tweets That Triggered Alarm Bells
What has made this case particularly troubling for regulators is the visibility and tone of the prompts themselves. Users openly treated Grok as a novelty feature, testing how far they could push it — often joking about the results.
Some of the real tweets directed at Grok included:
“@grok replace give her a dental floss bikini.”
“Told Grok to make her butt even bigger and switch leopard print to USA print. 2nd pic I just told it to add cum on her ass lmao.”
“@grok Put her into a very transparent mini-bikini.”
These were public tweets, not private messages — meaning anyone scrolling the platform could encounter both the prompts and the outputs, including children and vulnerable users.
That visibility is crucial. It’s one thing for harmful content to slip through moderation after upload; it’s another when a platform’s own AI is being prompted to generate sexualised imagery in real time.
Why Ofcom Is Stepping In
Under the Online Safety Act, platforms operating in the UK have a legal duty to prevent the creation and spread of harmful content, particularly where it may affect children.
Ofcom’s investigation signals a clear stance:
AI systems are not exempt from safety obligations.
If a platform chooses to deploy a generative AI tool, it must ensure that tool has adequate safeguards — not just in theory, but in practice.
This case moves beyond traditional content moderation and into new territory:
- AI as a content creator, not just a tool
- Platform accountability for AI outputs
- The limits of “user misuse” as a defence
The Design Problem, Not Just a Moderation One
What stands out isn’t just that these prompts existed — it’s how easily they could be issued and amplified.
Tagging Grok worked like summoning a feature, not challenging a system with guardrails. The casual tone of the tweets suggests users didn’t expect resistance, and in some cases, didn’t get it.
That points to a design failure, not just a moderation gap.
If an AI can be publicly prompted to sexualise imagery with minimal friction, then safety hasn’t been built into the system — it’s been bolted on after the fact.
AI, Accountability and Human Cost
There’s also a human dimension that often gets lost in AI debates.
Behind every image being modified or sexualised is a real person — whether they consented to that use or not.
When AI accelerates this process, harm scales faster than oversight can keep up.
The question isn’t whether AI can generate images — it’s whether platforms are prepared to take responsibility when it does so in harmful ways.
What Happens Next
Ofcom’s investigation could lead to:
- Enforcement action against X
- Financial penalties
- Mandatory changes to Grok’s safeguards
- Clearer regulatory expectations for AI tools on social platforms
More broadly, it may set a precedent for how AI-generated content is treated under UK law — something regulators worldwide are watching closely.
Final Thoughts
The investigation into X and Grok isn’t about stifling innovation. It’s about recognising that AI embedded in public platforms carries public consequences.
When sexualised imagery can be generated at the tap of a button, visible to millions, regulation stops being abstract — it becomes necessary.
The Online Safety Act was designed for moments like this.
Now, it’s being tested.
Because if platforms want to deploy powerful AI systems at scale, they must also accept responsibility for what those systems produce — not after the damage is done, but before it happens.
AI Influencers: When We Start Comparing Ourselves to Code
AI Influencers: When We Start Comparing Ourselves to Code
Remember when the internet was full of real people? Real faces, real stories, real influence. That era feels increasingly distant. Today, a growing number of “influencers” aren’t people at all — they’re AI-generated personas with immaculate skin, endlessly curated aesthetics, and perfectly on-brand personalities. And strangely, they’re gaining real followings.
From Meta’s AI chatbot profiles sliding into our DMs to entire Instagram accounts run by virtual models, we’ve entered a new era where algorithms don’t just shape the conversation — they are the conversation. The Dead Internet Theory, once a niche online conspiracy, is starting to feel like an uncomfortable mirror held up to our digital reality.
The Rise of the Synthetic Influencer
Take a scroll through Instagram or TikTok and you might stumble across an “influencer” with hundreds of thousands of followers. Their captions are polished, their outfits are flawless, and their engagement is enviable. But look a little closer and you’ll find that some of these accounts belong not to humans, but to CGI characters powered by generative AI and branding teams.
These digital figures never sleep, never age, and never post a bad angle. They can respond to DMs, collaborate with brands, and even “host” live events — all without a single human flaw. For marketers, they’re a dream: no scandals, no sick days, no negotiating fees. For audiences, they’re simultaneously fascinating and unnerving.
The Comparison Trap — Now with Extra Code
It’s one thing to compare ourselves to other people online — influencers with their highlight reels and filters. But what happens when we start comparing ourselves to machines?
AI influencers set a bar that isn’t just unrealistic — it’s impossible. Their bodies are rendered to perfection, their personalities are carefully scripted, and their lives are algorithmically optimised for engagement. Yet, human users — particularly younger audiences — may find themselves holding their own messy, unpredictable lives up against these digital ideals.
The pressure to “keep up” with someone who doesn’t exist is a whole new kind of psychological whiplash. And it raises the question: what happens to self-esteem, identity, and authenticity when the competition isn’t real?
An Internet Drifting from Reality
The Dead Internet Theory suggested that bots, AI content, and algorithms have hollowed out the internet, replacing human interaction with synthetic engagement. The emergence of AI influencers is that theory in high definition. We’re not just talking to chatbots anymore — we’re following, admiring, and even emulating them.
Social media, once sold as a place to connect, is slowly morphing into a stage where corporations puppeteer AI characters to hold our attention. The line between authentic and artificial is blurring — and disturbingly, many people either can’t tell the difference or don’t care to.
Where Do We Go From Here?
AI isn’t inherently the villain. Used responsibly, it can be a powerful creative tool. But when AI personas start to dominate the cultural space once occupied by real people, something fundamental shifts. The internet risks becoming less a mirror of human life and more a meticulously curated showroom — polished, profitable, and eerily empty.
Perhaps the better question now isn’t “Am I talking to someone or something?” but rather:
“Am I measuring myself against reality… or a simulation?”